Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Br J Haematol ; 190(1): e1-e3, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1388215
2.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(5): 103197, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1275746

RESUMEN

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is a major component in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. As a prerequisite, the successful collection of a sufficient number of viable peripheral blood hematopoietic CD34+ cells is critical. A common standard protocol for mobilization is currently not defined and critically discussed especially in German-speaking Europe. In times of the Covid-19 pandemic, safe and effective strategies have to be chosen to minimize hospitalization times and severe courses. In this single-center retrospective analysis, safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide plus etoposide (CE) and growth-factor support (n = 33) was compared to cyclophosphamide mono treatment and growth-factor support (n = 49) in 82 patients with multiple myeloma at first diagnosis. CE was superior to cyclophosphamide mono with a significantly higher number of collected CD34+ cells (15.46 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg vs. 9.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg), significantly faster engraftment of granulocytes after stem cell transplantation (day 10.5 vs. day 11.6), shorter duration of the inpatient stay (17.47 days vs. 19.16 days) and significantly less transfusions (8.82 % vs. 30.61 % patients receiving transfusions). The safety profile was comparable in both groups and in line with published data. We conclude that CE is a safe and highly effective mobilization protocol in patients with multiple myeloma at first diagnosis and appears to be superior to the commonly used cyclophosphamide mono regimen.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Ciclofosfamida/farmacología , Etopósido/farmacología , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/farmacología , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Proteínas de Mieloma/análisis , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trasplante Autólogo
3.
Mol Med ; 27(1): 48, 2021 05 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1224858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a potentially fatal complication of systemic inflammation. HMGB1 is a nuclear protein released extracellularly during proinflammatory lytic cell death or secreted by activated macrophages, NK cells, and additional cell types during infection or sterile injury. Extracellular HMGB1 orchestrates central events in inflammation as a prototype alarmin. TLR4 and the receptor for advanced glycation end products operate as key HMGB1 receptors to mediate inflammation. METHODS: Standard ELISA and cytometric bead array-based methods were used to examine the kinetic pattern for systemic release of HMGB1, ferritin, IL-18, IFN-γ, and MCP-1 before and during treatment of four children with critical MAS. Three of the patients with severe underlying systemic rheumatic diseases were treated with biologics including tocilizumab or anakinra when MAS developed. All patients required intensive care therapy due to life-threatening illness. Add-on etoposide therapy was administered due to insufficient clinical response with standard treatment. Etoposide promotes apoptotic rather than proinflammatory lytic cell death, conceivably ameliorating subsequent systemic inflammation. RESULTS: This therapeutic intervention brought disease control coinciding with a decline of the increased systemic HMGB1, IFN-γ, IL-18, and ferritin levels whereas MCP-1 levels evolved independently. CONCLUSION: Systemic HMGB1 levels in MAS have not been reported before. Our results suggest that the molecule is not merely a biomarker of inflammation, but most likely also contributes to the pathogenesis of MAS. These observations encourage further studies of HMGB1 antagonists. They also advocate therapeutic etoposide administration in severe MAS and provide a possible biological explanation for its mode of action.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Proteína HMGB1/sangre , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/sangre , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Citocinas/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/etiología , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Med Hypotheses ; 144: 110180, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-765363

RESUMEN

We present the AI-discovered aetiology of COVID-19, based on a precise disease model of COVID-19 built under five weeks that best matches the epidemiological characteristics, transmission dynamics, clinical features, and biological properties of COVID-19 and consistently explains the rapidly expanding COVID-19 literature. We present that SARS-CoV-2 implements a unique unbiased survival strategy of balancing viral replication with viral spread by increasing its dependence on (i) ACE2-expressing cells for viral entry and spread, (ii) PI3K signaling in ACE2-expressing cells for viral replication and egress, and (iii) viral- non-structural-and-accessory-protein-dependent immunomodulation to balance viral spread and viral replication. We further propose the combination of irinotecan (an in-market topoisomerase I inhibitor) and etoposide (an in-market topoisomerase II inhibitor) could potentially be an exceptionally effective treatment to protect critically ill patients from death caused by COVID-19-specific cytokine storms triggered by sepsis, ARDS, and other fatal comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/etiología , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Brotes de Enfermedades , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Transducción de Señal , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa I/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa II/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Internalización del Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Replicación Viral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA